Culturally Appropriating the Word “Liberal”

I became politically aware as a teenager in the mid-1970s. It was a different country, and a different world. America 1.0, as I like to call it. I gravitated naturally to the far Left side of the political spectrum. I was against all war. I thought the poor were getting a raw deal. I didn’t think blue-collar workers were being paid enough. I felt sympathy for the unjustly convicted and opposed the death penalty. I thought marijuana should be legalized. I believed our leaders should be focusing on the many domestic problems, instead of senseless foreign intervention.

Most importantly, I became a civil libertarian. Patrick Henry’s words, “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend to my dying day your right to say it” resonated with me almost as much as Huey Long’s great “Share the Wealth” speeches. I was also influenced by Hugh Hefner’s Playboy Philosophy, which talked about “victimless crimes” and ignited my libertarian streak.

I thought the Democrats, or most of them, were the good guys. I cast my first vote for Jimmy Carter, even though I liked almost all the other party presidential candidates better. I really liked Frank Church, especially when he headed the first congressional investigation to expose the abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency.

It didn’t take long for me to become more politically mature. I grew to understand that most of the social programs created additional costly bureaucracies, and didn’t seem to provide much help to those who needed it. Once the Vietnam War finally ended, I began to notice that most Democrats were just as pro-war as most Republicans.

The election of Bill Clinton in 1992 signaled the end of the old “liberalism,” which had drawn me to politics in the first place. Clinton was the first politician to make a habit of virtue signaling rhetoric, in which he could “feel your pain,” but his “reforms” resulted in poor people getting less financial aid for shorter periods, and convicted more largely Black people of “victimless crimes” than ever before. His myriad of personal and political scandals made Richard Nixon, whom I had considered the ultimate villain in my youth, look like Thomas Jefferson.

Clinton was the first to co-opt the term “liberal” without adhering to any of the classic tenets of liberalism. He didn’t overtly support the unions that were even then largely impotent. He didn’t demand higher wages for average workers, or criticize the incredible growth of CEO compensation, often accompanied by large layoffs. He lobbied hard for the passage of NAFTA, one of the deadliest pieces of legislation in our history, and never batted an eye at the outsourcing and offshore factories that followed.

Bill Clinton might have bombed Kosovo, and helped consolidate the media into a  handful of huge corporations, but he could speak identity politics fluently. And that’s all that mattered to his base, which were being converted from empathetic, traditional liberals fighting for the little guy into authoritarians concerned over the views of those they opposed.

By the time Barack Obama arrived on the scene, he was treated like a male, biracial Mother Theresa by a fawning media and an even larger constituency indoctrinated for years by the virtue signaling professors that were already dominant in every major university. Obama was celebrated for what he was and how he looked, not for his political beliefs or principles. He was perhaps even better at feeling others’ pain that Bill Clinton was. But he too proved to be adept and bombing and even killing others, which he actually bragged about. And his supporters loved it.

The election of Donald Trump triggered something deep inside all of those now mature Social Justice Warriors, who’d been born under Clinton and climbed to positions of power under Obama. We see them now as the mayors and police chiefs of all the cities being besieged by looting, who have no desire to stop it.

The classical liberals, inspired by the likes of Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, Charles Dickens, William Jennings Bryan, Huey Long, and John F. Kennedy, are now all but gone from public life. Some of my friends, like peace activist Cindy Sheehan and former Rep. Cynthia McKinney, try their best, but no one on the left is interested in marching for peace now. Or protecting civil liberties. Sheehan and McKinney aren’t going to be welcome at the Democratic convention.

Instead, “liberals” today largely consist of often deluded Social Justice Warriors. They think and act with emotion, not reason. Their primary goal doesn’t seem to be fighting for the rights of those who’ve been denied them, but to take away the rights of those they disagree with. They don’t remotely believe in the Bill of Rights, especially the First Amendment. How many people have been fired recently, for posting a comment on social media, in their free time, which offended these Social Justice Warriors?

These poor souls are forced into public acts of contrition, but still lose their jobs, anyway. Why they still apologize for exercising their constitutional right to free speech is beyond me. The virtue signalers whose loud complaints got them fired, feel no remorse. No sense of guilt over families thrown into financial turmoil, especially in this unprecedented fragile economy. The new Left doesn’t care about the unemployed, especially if they disagree with them politically. It makes them feel good to see someone that offended them fired. That’s the essence of identity politics.

It doesn’t take much for Social Justice Warrior to demand someone’s termination. A pro soccer player was recently cut by his team for comments his wife made on Twitter. The stepmother of one of the officers involved in the shooting of the man found asleep in a Burger King drive-through was fired. For being  his stepmother. Others have lost their jobs for uttering undeniable truths like “all lives matter.” When that is considered not only controversial, but a fireable offense, then we have reached the heights of lunacy.

I am very active on social media. For celebrating Roger Stone’s commutation, I was blasted by some who had been big fans of my work. One person told me Stone should be shot for treason. Another said he should be hanged. Someone else said no one deserved prison more than him, and that he should be given a life sentence. For contrived process crimes, and a politicized prosecution in a kangaroo courtroom? So Stone deserves prison more than serial killers and child rapists?

I had much the same reaction for posting what I considered very good news, about embattled Kentucky teenager Nicholas Sandmann winning an undisclosed out of court settlement from the Washington Post. A good cyber friend, whom I respect greatly, called him a name and said he should “have his teeth kicked in.” Others called the teenager a “racist.” Clearly, that MAGA hat triggered them. They don’t need much triggering, but this red hat sets Social Justice Warriors off like nothing else.

The irrational hostility of these authoritarians who have commandeered the political Left is centered on Donald Trump. The inner party members in George Orwell’s 1984, engaged in the “two minute hate” while viewing the image and hearing the words of the opposition leader known as Goldstein. Today’s Social Justice Warriors engage in a 24 hour hate against the image and words of Donald Trump.

There is a consistent anti-White theme to everything the Social Justice Warriors say, and advocate. While the vast majority of these virtue signalers are White themselves, that doesn’t stop them from blasting “White privilege” nonstop. The irony of a group like Black Lives Matter being only 16% Black has been lost on our largely dumbed down populace. These protesters and looters are largely angry Whites. Who or what is financing and supporting them ought to be of concern to investigative journalists, if we had any.

With the violent tearing down of statues, the Social Justice Warriors have crossed another line. They have met no resistance from any of the “White supremacists” running this “racist” country yet. Their irrationality is on full display here. They have claimed Mahatma Gandhi, a Brown man who fought White colonialism and inspired the Black civil rights movement, was a “White Supremacist.” They want to tear down his statue, too. How can you possibly have a rational discourse with such people?

“Liberal” used to be a positive term. It indicated one who was interested in reform, and advocating for the poor and powerless. It has come to mean an authoritarian control freak, who not only has never heard of “victimless crimes,” but wants to create new offenses, such as “hate crimes,” to punish those whose beliefs make them angry. The Social Justice Warriors probably have never heard of Orwell’s “thought crime,” and thus have no awareness of how close they come to supporting such a dangerous concept.

I know I’m in a very small minority. Anti-war. Anti death penalty. A free speech purist. Not ashamed of being White. Concerned with class, not race. Judging people, like Martin Luther King, by the content of their character.

About donaldjeffries

Author of the critically acclaimed best sellers "Hidden History: An Expose of Modern Crimes, Conspiracies, and Cover Ups in American Politics,""Survival of the Richest: How the Corruption of the Marketplace and the Disparity of Wealth Created the Greatest Conspiracy of All," and the newly released "Crimes and Cover Ups in American Politics: 1776-1963." Author of the 2007 sci-fi/fantasy novel "The Unreals," which has been described as a cross between The Wizard of Oz and The Twilight Zone, and compared to A Confederacy of Dunces and classic Russian literature. A second edition of "The Unreals" was published in February 2015 by Pocol Press. Long time JFK assassination researcher. Seeker of truth, proponent of justice and fairness. Enemy of corruption. Sender of as many "tiny ripples of hope" as possible.

Posted on July 28, 2020, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 17 Comments.

  1. A. Toutenthop

    You are dead on, as usual. I dont know why people were so outraged by Stone’s commutation. He still retains his felony record. He should have been pardoned in my opinion. A person has the right to be silent or lie to the FBI . They can lie to you but you cant lie to them? Weird. The left in recent months has embraced everything they claim to hate.

    Women forced to wear face coverings by way of religious statute? Evil. Women forced to wear face coverings by health “authorities?” Amazing and good. What happened to “My body my choice?”

    • Fayez Abedaziz

      Hey, are you just stupid or have a rage against Moslems?
      Is that what you have to say after all the issues the author addressed?
      With all concerns we have, you pick a religion to bash?
      Did anyone tell you that your girlfriend or wife (if you’re a male) has to wear a scarf like some Moslem and Jewish wear-by choice- they are not forced- ?
      So mind your own business and shut the hell up, find a hobby!

      • Just wow… you have embraced, in entirety, the whole premise of Don’s article.
        1. You have chosen to be offended by something that was completely un-offensive. I can’t believe you are being real, because he was making the contradistinction that the public at large was outraged over religious (didn’t even say Moslem) face coverings being mandated, yet not outraged by the Covid Mask.
        2. Where did he “bash” a religion?
        3. You then attack him telling him to BE SILENT.

        Please pick up a dictionary and look up either hypocrite or irony. Both are appropriate. But if you are sincere, then it won’t matter because as Don so eloquently wrote, there is no reasoning with people like you.

  2. David Bartram

    Thanks for sharing your political evolution, it was very interesting. Similar to you, Clinton was the one who started to make a lot of things clear to me. It took a while to sink in, maybe because I’m older than you and maybe more invested in what I thought it meant to be a liberal. Clinton supported the Union I belonged to, the IBEW, and they him, but neither supported us, the workers. I appreciate your writing.

  3. Christopher McKinley

    “The irony of a group like Black Lives Matter being only 16% Black has been lost on our largely dumbed down populace.” That reminded me that the first 16 popes of the Roman Catholic Church were, well, Hebes. And the first 16 presidents of the N.A.A.C.P. were, well Hebes. I’m thinking Hebrews are very adept at creating and operating organizational structures. That’s a compliment.
    I was also thinking that every family of four, you know a traditional father, a traditional mother, and least two healthy, unvaccinated children need at least 4,000 square feet of land to feed, clothe and house themselves.
    That to me sounds a lot better than getting down on your knees and begging Pelosi, Shumer, McConnell and all those other looney tunes in the U.S. Congress to continue our daily existence.
    I wonder what those rabid mongrels in antifa and BLM think of that.

  4. You are still scum like all left wing terrorists.

  5. Off-topic, please copy and share!!

    “Doctors for the Truth” Speak Out in Madrid, Denounce Covid-19 “False Pandemic”

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/more-doctors-truth-speak-out-madrid-dismantling-false-pandemic-covid-19/5719993

    With the participation of hundreds of professionals from all over the world, “Doctors for the Truth” stated that Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes. They urged doctors, the media and political authorities to stop the operation, by spreading the truth.

  6. Well said. The left left me behind. Trump and the Republicans certainly have their problems, but there is no way on earth I want the Democrats running things.

  7. How many of you got ripped off by Steve Bannon’s “We Build the Wall” scam?

    • Nobody was ripped off. The allegation is that the paid somebody a salary under the table and that some of the money was used for personal expenses. The actually did spend a large portion on a wall. Whether its a good idea or not is a completely different question.

      • You are right. It was strictly honest. I have a friend who’s collecting for Stephen’s legal fund. If you want I will send you the link. Please give generously.

      • Bannon is a wealthy guy. I think he can afford a lawyer.

  8. Marianne Casserly

    I’m sure you’ve read about how Claudia Conway has gone off the rails due to her mother’s neglect. Her father was equally as culpable – they both screwed up.. Kellyanne Conway’s decision to neglect her family to seek fame and disseminate propaganda has wreaked havoc on her family. That was inevitable. Now she’s leaving Trumpworld, purportedly to be “more of a mom.” Whether that’s true or not is almost irrelevant. It could be too late for her children. Anyone who seeks fame and ego gratification above all is going to harm their family. This is particularly true when a person is intent on selling propaganda; the family becomes an afterthought. I’ve seen it happen over and over again. It’s sad, really. The children should not have to suffer so that the parent can feel good about him/herself by seeking celebrity..

    • I think if you looked into the families of most high profile persons, you’d find similarly sad stories. Children of the famous often feel jealous, or slighted, because of their parent’s fame. And naturally, the parent doesn’t devote as much time to them as they should, so the child can easily feel neglected or unloved. That’s my armchair analysis at any rate.

      • I’m a Christ follower – try to be anyway. If you are an atheist, I don’t intend to disparage you with my reply. But, I think most social disfunction is caused when people seek fame and recognition from men rather than God. John wrote about this in his gospel account saying, “For they loved praise from men rather than God.” (John 12:43)

        Men typically don’t stick to principles or morals that are superior to those their own intelligence and wisdom can produce. And even those that they do come up with are subject to the approval of others. Hence, “society.”

        I think this disfunction breaks down at the smallest level of the relational microcosm, the individual – the relationship we have with ourselves. Seeking approval from others causes us to doubt ourselves, to look outward for solutions rather than inward and to essentially disregard their own responsibilities. I don’t think it’s limited to any social stratus. And if we can’t get approval from our own parents, who brought us into this world, how are we going to function other than to spend our lives chasing for this approval?

        Just look at how few people are truly adherent to the principles laid out in the constitution, for instance. I wouldn’t suggest the constitution comes from God. But it is an example of a set of moral principles and laws that we’re all supposed to agree should govern our society.

        Yet, if one of those constructs is propagandized as being subject to social cancel – say the second amendment, or Congress’ power to make war, rather than the President – we can just disregard it because it’s no longer popular.

        Any time parents put their own personal position and influence above the needs of their child, bad stuff is going to happen.

        Anytime politicians put their own interests above the needs of the people they serve, bad stuff is going to happen.

        According to my own belief system, when people put their morals above the ones God has delivered bad stuff is going to happen. But, the covenant with God is a personal choice. So, I don’t care if someone is an atheist or a Christian, I care if somebody treats the covenants they are bound to as being a sacred duty.

        I wish we could focus on that root cause rather than fighting one another. People who break covenants should not be considered worthy to exercise political authority on our behalf. But in general, people aren’t concerned about that. Because to hold a politician at such a high standard would mean that we would have to hold ourselves to that standard.

  1. Pingback: Culturally Appropriating the Word "Liberal" | awarecitizen.com

Leave a Reply to David Bartram Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: