Another Show Trial For Another Patsy

The recent trial of alleged Boston Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was just the latest high-profile example of how corrupt our legal system is. Tsarnaev was accorded the same brand of justice that patsies charged with significant events have received since at least the 1930s, when hapless Bruno Richard Hauptmann was “defended” by a famous lawyer known by the confidence-building name of “Death House” Reilly.

Tsarnaev’s attorney was Judy Clarke, who seems to gravitate to these cases. She built her undeserved reputation by “defending” the likes of Unabomber Ted Kaczynski and purported Gabby Giffords’ assailant Jared Lee Loughner. Despite the fact that Tsarnaev had initially pleaded not guilty to all 30 charges against him, and the myriad of easily detected holes in the case against him, Clarke opened her defense by telling the court, “It was him.” There was no attempt to cross-examine the dubious witnesses, or dismantle the easily dismantled arguments of the prosecution. Instead, Clarke blamed Dzhokhar’s deceased older brother, killed under very questionable circumstances by the police, and insinuated that the younger boy was merely a naive dupe.

Clarke’s ridiculous, twenty minute closing statement consisted of attempts to cast her client in the role of misguided, jealous sibling. “He expressed he was jealous of his brother, who achieved martyrdom,” Clarke declared. She did not explain how he was by any definition a martyr, or who would have considered him as such. She bought every bit of the absurd official narrative, including the mind numbingly impossible “confession” Dzhokhar supposedly wrote on the side of the boat where he was captured.

The entire Boston Bombing event has been dissected to pieces on the internet, by real citizen investigators. There are no true investigative spirits left in the mainstream media, of course, so the mainstream media dutifully passed along all the implausible elements of this story, without questioning a single thing. Their “coverage” was perhaps best expressed in a March 30, 2015 Vanity Fair headline, “Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, The Boston Bomber, Has the Most Ferocious Lawyer in America Defending Him.” How many inaccuracies can one media organ fit into a single headline? Clarke’s defense of Tsarnaev certainly turned out to be anything but “ferocious,” and the magazine might at least have paid cursory service to the whole “innocent until proven guilty” thing, and identified Tsarnaev as the “alleged” Boston Bomber.

But the secrecy surrounding these proceedings even taxed the patience of the compliant establishment press. The Washington Post complained, in a January 29, 2015 story, that they “have never faced the sorts of restrictions imposed by Judge George O’Toole in the case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev…The bulk of the filings in the case are under seal…and reporters are excluded from seeing or hearing much of the courtroom discussion that would customarily be public.” Judy Clarke called all of four witnesses before resting her case, and never cross- examined any of the victims.

Even leaving aside all the questionable aspects of the event, which were captured on film and subjected to intense scrutiny on the internet, the case against the Tsarnaev brothers was flimsier even than the case against Timothy McVeigh in the Oklahoma City Bombing, and it should have been destroyed by any competent defense attorney. Was older brother Tamerlan an FBI informant?  Their mother insisted that the FBI had been in contact with Tamerlan for up to five years. What about all the footage of individuals wearing the uniform of private security firm Craft International, complete with backpacks, who were in the immediate vicinity of the blast?

The questions are plentiful. Why were runners told that a bomb squad drill was taking place during the Boston Marathon? As participant Alastair Stevenson told a local television station, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about.” Stevenson also described lookouts on the rooftops and “dogs with their handlers sniffing around for explosives..” Clearly, this cried out for investigation, but the mainstream media has become totally toothless and hardly more than a mouthpiece for the state at this point.

Was it really Tamerlan who was killed by the authorities in a shoot out? How and why was he shot, after being apprehended naked (and how strange was that?) His aunt claimed adamantly to alternative reporters that the naked man was not her nephew. And what about the preposterous added detail, not seen in the footage (which also doesn’t show the naked “Tamerlan” being shot or even injured as he is led into a police car) that Dzhokhar backed the car over his brother’s body in an attempt to escape?

A key question is just how Judy Clarke came to be Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s attorney. Could he not make her aware of the key flaws in the case against him? What about his family- they had been quite vocal early on about his (and Tamerlan’s) innocence, although his mother was pressured to flee America and could only rant about the verdict from abroad. Exactly who decided to “appoint” Clarke to represent Tsarnaev? Surely, with all the conjecture about the case, there must have been a decent lawyer somewhere who was cognizant of the holes in the story, and anxious to bolster their reputation by defending Tsarnaev.

What about Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s friend Ibragim Todashev, who was simply murdered by the FBI while in custody? You read that correctly. That’s all the information we have about this incident; that Todashev was killed while being questioned. This is a highly unusual circumstance, to say the least. What innocent explanation would there be for a witness under interrogation to ever be killed by the authorities? Needless to say, there are no Woodward and Bernsteins out there in the heartland to ask the tough questions of those who were responsible for Todashev’s death. But it certainly isn’t a “conspiracy theory” to be flabbergasted and highly suspicious about this.

The “evidence” against the Tsarnaev brothers consisted largely of a video tape that the authorities have yet to produce, and which even his inept defense team declared did not exist, and a mysterious, still unidentified witness known only as “Danny,” a Chinese man who was supposedly carjacked by the Tsarnaevs and heard Tamerlan conveniently confess to the Boston Bombing, as well as to the shooting of a police officer at MIT. Following the death of Tamerlan under still unclear circumstances, a huge manhunt for Dzhokhar ensued, resulting in a virtual lockdown of the city and culminating in the apprehension of the younger brother, amid a fusillade of excess bullets, in a boat in the backyard of a residence.

How did “Danny” escape the clutches of the carjacking fugitives? How did Dzhokhar escape the authorities, in the midst of a huge shootout, during which he was wildly outmatched, and elude them for so long when the entire area was under intense surveillance? Why wasn’t the eerily timed drill investigated? Why didn’t the defense raise any of the multitude of questions that cry out for answers?

In the aftermath of the apprehension of the wounded Dzhokhar, America regressed into its customary Idiocracy-like mindlessness. “Boston Strong” became the rallying cry everywhere, from sporting events to shameless politicians, as everyone praised the city itself for somehow being heroic by virtue of enduring an event that took the lives of three people. They also proudly endured virtual martial law, and Americans were treated to videos of military tanks rolling through tree-lined streets, with sharpshooters pointing their weapons at innocent residents. They ordered citizens out of their homes without any reason or rationale. And after all the terrorizing was over, the citizens who experienced it cheered the militarized police, crediting their heroes for a capture they would never have made without the help of the resident of the home, who contacted the clueless authorities and told them the suspect was outside hiding in his boat.

I refer those interested in the more frightening, esoteric elements of the Boston Bombing story to the work done by Dave McGowan on his web site. He really goes down the rabbit hole at this link: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr114.html  If ever there was a case where a real defense could have embarrassed the authorities by exposing their lies and chicanery, it was this one. A first year law student could have done a better job than Judy Clarke. But I’m sure the mainstream media still thinks she’s “ferocious.”

In the end, Judy Clarke’s curious strategy of fighting only to defeat the death penalty failed, as Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was sentenced to death. And so he will presumably join Timothy McVeigh in the pantheon of patsies killed by the state, forever silenced without even testifying in his own defense. Like McVeigh, Dzhokhar sat stoically throughout his farce of a trial, and there is little chance that he will ever be interviewed by any intrepid journalist before his execution.

Dzhokhar’s fate was assured from the moment he was charged. To be accused of a highly publicized violent crime, especially where any political motives can be ascribed, is tantamount to guilt in our culture. Did anyone really imagine that Bruno Richard Hauptmann, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan, Timothy McVeigh, Jared  Lee Loughner or Dzhokhar Tsarnaev would be found not guilty? Does anyone expect that James Holmes (the alleged Aurora, Colorado “Batman” shooter whose trial is about to begin) will be found not guilty? There is a 100% conviction rate in these kinds of high-profile cases, which makes every one of the trials associated with them nothing more than legal charades.

There is far more to this story than I can write about here. I would urge interested readers to check out all the excellent videos readily available online, that break down all the impossible aspects of the incident, and show beyond any doubt that, whatever happened that day at the Boston Marathon, the Tsarnaev brothers weren’t responsible for it.

Advertisements

About donaldjeffries

Author of the best seller "Hidden History: An Expose of Modern Crimes, Conspiracies, and Cover-Ups in American Politics," published in November 2014 by Skyhorse Publishing. Author of the 2007 sci-fi/fantasy novel "The Unreals," which has been described as a cross between The Wizard of Oz and The Twilight Zone, and compared to A Confederacy of Dunces and classic Russian literature. A second edition of "The Unreals" was published in February 2015 by Pocol Press. Long time JFK assassination researcher. Marketing more fiction and nonfiction, including a book about bullying and the social hierarchy, and a book about the Natalee Holloway case.

Posted on May 15, 2015, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 12 Comments.

  1. Hi, Cynthia McKinney here. I’d LOVE to have a discussion with you. Let’s talk about WHEN.

  2. I feel it is about time we have our own “show trial” like a class action civl suit against the US Government Administration for the continuing cover-up by still hiding public records from the people in cases such as JFK, MLK, RFK, and the Saudi funding Chapter of the 9/11 Commission Report. Preaching to the choir is better than nothing but if we continue to keep this up, just complaining about the system and arguing with each other about the details we are doing what the War System has scared us into doing… the same thing over and over expecting a different result.

    The lies and cover-ups has made us crazy but at some point soon we should take legal action against our tormentors, the record keepers of our Hidden History under the pretext of “National Security” which has just lost a federal case for spying on everybody. I remember many decades ago i asked the head of the ACLU in Florida that if we could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a cover-up of the Assassination of JFK would they take action and his answer was “NO”.

    If things remain the same what should we do besides talk?

    • I’m not sure what we can do at this point, Jim, other than to try and wake up as many people as possible. I don’t think we have any legal recourse, because the legal system is so systematically corrupt. I do think that, as the economy continues to implode, and more young people especially realize what an authoritarian/draconian dystopia they’re facing, that we may eventually reach a critical mass, where enough people are awake to perhaps truly make a difference.

      • Donald, that is what we always here isn’t it, that We can’t have justice until things get bad enough. Justice might be just the right thing to keep the war economy from leading the world to disaster, the course you seem to be aware of while waiting for the economy to implode is a good excuse to do nothing.

        Good things happen if we will it, nothing happens by itself and if disaster happens from doing nothing that will be another excuse that things are so bad nobody cares about the cover-up of Assassinations and endless war planning which are now legal for “national security”. My idea is we need the courage to do the right thing to prevent disaster before we allow it by doing nothing but talk. So, we can disagree about this ancient paradox of humanity ~ To act or to wait.

  3. Jim, I respect your views. I don’t know what else I can do. I’ve written a book that takes on all the most controversial issues of our times, and I am giving as many interviews about it as possible, and trying not to pull any punches. I’d certainly love to see justice prevail, and overturn what you accurately call the “war economy.” But how do we get justice?

    Hopefully, I am acting, by doing what I can as one individual, and not just waiting.

    • You are doing good Donald. I am a witness to the JFK plot along with Phi Ochs and were told about it before it happened and suffered the consequences so i am impatient. Maybe we can get a peace movement going again. this just came in.

      Jay D Alexander‎Jim Glover
      16 hrs · Edited ·
      Hope you can help make it happen Jim and singers and song writers and poets and actors and artists in the Tampa Bay Area a UN INternational Peace Day Hootenanny spot for song, poetry and skits on the subject of Peace and Love…at Sacred Lands in St Petersburg on Monday… on Sept 21st if interested get in touch with me on facebook and we only have 4 months of planning to help organize this at I can also be reached on my cell at 727 324 3585

      Unlike · Comment · Share
      You and Sylvia Ryerson like this.

      Jim Glover OK Sept 21st is my Mom’s birthday and she was a fighter for peace too. Amazing how many things connect that CIA calls “coincidence”.
      Like · Reply · 23 mins

  4. It’s more than show trial; it’s a “Phony Government”. The Massachusetts State Reps and Senators are frauds with fictitcious names and fabricated histories. They staff their offices with their family and friends. The Board of Bar Overseers issues the ones who have “Attorney” in their fabricated history phony credentials and the corrupt Universities validate these unearned credentials. The phony Secretary allows them to set up phony businesses.

    The Speaker of the Massachusetts House is even a phony. The scandals and subsequent indictments and trials where these fools are defendants are all for show to make it look like they uphold and respect law. They are robbing the people blind. It appears hey started to infiltrate in the mid 80’s and it really took off after 911.

    These frauds in public servant taxpayer supported positions are not even from Massachusetts and their phony photos and videos which contain digitally altered images of their actual family and friends present phony constituents, phony crowds and phony hearings which allows them to lead their actual lives in their actual home states. The only one I am not sure about is Kennedy.

    It is happening at the county and local level, as well, and it bleeds into the US Congress and Senate. We are under a coup. These are the middlemen – they are family clans from all over the country. The states are now simply a corrupt arm of the corrupt federal government.

    Even the newly elected Massachusetts Governor and Boston Mayor are frauds. The inauguration was a psyop. No reason what-so-ever why we should have a grainy video of such an event and the purpose was to alter images.

    I have them identified and all the connections. They are also connected to Boston Marathon “victims”. The Tsarnaev trial is a complete farce THERE IS NO ACTUAL DEFENDANT. Katherine Clark who had been, both, a Massachusetts Senator and Representative took Markey’s place in the US Congressional House after he won the Senate seat. In her real life, she is connected to the actor that plays Sydney Corcoran and the actor who plays JP Norden. The actor who plays JP is an actual amputee but he lost his leg to cancer long before the Marathon. I have identified most if not all of these “victims” and it appears he is the only one that is an actual amputee; the others have their prosthetics brought to us via video fraud including Jeff Bauman.

    The Commonwealth also credentialed phony doctors, nurses and rehab people. The cops are also frauds. I found the ENTIRE Watertown police team, phony State Police including Alben and the new guy that looks like the walking dead is, also, an actor; his real life appearance is not quite so concerning. The trolls and shills are plentiful because, in one way or another, they are connected to this enormous network of frauds and preservation of the status quo is PRIORITY.

  5. Written well and informed with all that is available. Thank you for putting this together without personal and emotional reactions/rants. It is the facts and they surely speak for themselves, but they do need more people like you to write in a logical terms so others can decide for themselves what this is all about instead of being fed by just main-stream media.

    When I watched the news immediately after the bombs went off (and the media was all about being first with the scoop) a couple was in a restaurant being interviewed about how they were told to stay inside due to a drill going on outside… I keep on asking my husband to this day if this is what we heard and saw on the news, because now Im sure that tape does not exist and the few of us that watched this particular interview are questioning themselves as to what they really saw…

    I have been interested ever since and thanks for the article!

    • There was a drill in Boston, and in Dallas two Nasa agents told me that FBI Director Hoover told them it was a test that went bad. They told me that on Sunday 11/24/63 because some authorities, Hoover and Counter intel CIA knew that I was told of the plot before it happened and was not the type to shut up. Also it is documented there was an attack test during 9/11.

      Would any of this be admitted in court? No, Because these are “National Security” secrets and it is illegal for the government to release this kind of information and even reveal the names of informants, sources, methods and anything in essence that would make the government look bad. Logic tells me the judge told the lawyers what was admissible and even talking about what is not admissible is prohibited. Russia warned the CIA about the Boston Brothers before it happened but they were on the anti Russian side of the old great war game and We should know the Drill by now. The rules make it illegal to find the truth from the law so it is up to us citizens to find, research and share what they are not allowed to reveal.

  6. In my reply to http://twitter.com/ElizabethHeir I meant to say “About Dallas” not in Dallas (my mistake). The Nasa Agents were with me for a while on the trip back to LA from the Houston area. I reported this to the FBI in Tampa in 91 and they told me to go to the press and the last thing was “You do what you got to do and we will do what we have to do”. In essence what they were saying is I am free to do what they are not. We are free to do what they are not allowed to do… so far.

  1. Pingback: POLITICAL COVER-UPS _ on Soapbox | NO LIES RADIO

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: